AI Qazaqstan
Исследования

AI Exposure and the Changing Responsibilities in Job Postings

arXiv:2611.09870v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The growing adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in the workplace has raised questions about how employer demand for different work activities is changing. We examine how the prevalence and content of work activities in online job postings change in association with activity-level measures of AI exposure, derived from Copilot and Claude usage. To enable systematic comparisons, we develop a pipeline that extracts the responsibilities from job ad

9 November 2026 · Source: arXiv cs.CY (Computers and Society)

View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:The growing adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in the workplace has raised questions about how employer demand for different work activities is changing. We examine how the prevalence and content of work activities in online job postings change in association with activity-level measures of AI exposure, derived from Copilot and Claude usage. To enable systematic comparisons, we develop a pipeline that extracts the responsibilities from job advertisements and maps them onto O*NET's standardized taxonomy of Intermediate Work Activities (IWAs). We then apply this approach to 50,000 job advertisements from 33 firms between 2023 and 2025. From this analysis, we first find that explicit mentions of AI increased by 66%, although much of this growth occurs outside descriptions of the actual work activities associated with a job. Looking specifically at the advertised job responsibilities, activities with greater AI exposure tend to decline in advertised prevalence, but only mildly as a share of the total number of responsibilities. At the same time, more AI-exposed work activities increasingly are associated with explicitly AI-related responsibilities, suggesting that employers are looking to hire people who can perform these responsibilities with AI. arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) From: Lin Ai [view email] [v1] Fri, 6 Nov 2026 18:48:36 UTC (505 KB)

Read at the source →

More in this topic

ИсследованияSame Facts, Different Remedy: Linguistic Profiling and Arbitrariness in LLM and System One DecisionsarXiv:2611.08995v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models are increasingly used to resolve consumer complaints, and the way complainants write varies with age, education and socioeconomic status (SES). We audit three remedy-decision systems using sociolinguistic rewrites of US consumer financial complaints that are instructed to preserve every fact: two generative LLMs that return a single label (GPT-4o-mini and GPT-5-mini) and a probabilistic "System One" model that returns a distriarXiv cs.CY (Computers and Society)
ИсследованияSeeing Is Not Knowing: The Epistemic Limits of LLM-Based Mental Health Inference from Youth Social Media ConversationsarXiv:2611.08565v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Adolescents increasingly use social media for private conversations, sharing experiences and seeking support. These interactions generate digital traces, prompting efforts to infer mental health and psychosocial states. As large language models become more capable of reasoning about conversations and interpersonal dynamics, a fundamental question remains nonetheless: what can models actually "know" about an individual's psychological experience farXiv cs.CY (Computers and Society)
ИсследованияEntering a New Domain in the Era of Generative AI: An Autoethnography of Solo Game Development as a Bioinformatics EducatorarXiv:2611.09623v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The rapid improvement of generative AI (GenAI) not only increased the efficiency of practice but also empowered individuals with capabilities to explore new domains. However, identity formation in the wake of such empowerment remains understudied. We use an autoethnography to understand identity formation in the context of solo game development as a bioinformatics educator. With the goal of developing a create-your-own-adventure (CYOA) game, we carXiv cs.CY (Computers and Society)
ИсследованияRemembering Is Not Enough: Evaluating Timing and Omission in Longitudinal AI Mental Health SupportarXiv:2611.08721v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Evaluations of large language models (LLMs) for mental health support commonly focus on the clinical appropriateness of individual responses, potentially overlooking failures that emerge across extended interactions. As AI assistants accumulate memory of users' circumstances and prior disclosures, this raises an accountability question: Do AI chatbots provide appropriate support as users' needs evolve? We investigate by analyzing 14,256 longitudinaarXiv cs.CY (Computers and Society)