Исследования

Risk and Return in Government Bonds -- by Matteo Leombroni, Carolin Pflueger, Adi Sunderam

Does the compensation investors require for holding government bonds vary with their risk? We measure expected excess returns using market yields and professional forecasts of future yields, showing that they are tightly linked to a standard measure of risk: bonds’ betas with respect to the stock market. In a month-by-maturity panel of U. S. Treasuries from 1988 to 2024, the correlation between expected excess returns and bond–stock betas is 67%. The correlation is driven by variation in market

7 November 2026 · Source: NBER new working papers

Does the compensation investors require for holding government bonds vary with their risk? We measure expected excess returns using market yields and professional forecasts of future yields, showing that they are tightly linked to a standard measure of risk: bonds’ betas with respect to the stock market. In a month-by-maturity panel of U. S. Treasuries from 1988 to 2024, the correlation between expected excess returns and bond–stock betas is 67%. The correlation is driven by variation in market yields rather than forecasters’ expectations. The relationship between realized excess returns and betas is weak in a univariate regression, but it becomes economically large and significant when we control for monetary-policy and macroeconomic forecast errors. Similar results obtain in an international panel of developed countries from 1989 to 2024. Our findings suggest that variation in risk premia driven by changing bond risk accounts for more than half of both the decline in U.S. long-term bond yields since the mid-1980s and their increase since 2020. Acknowledgements and Disclosures We thank Nick Bloom, John Campbell, Mike Golosov, Hanno Lustig, Alan Moreira, Kelly Shue (discussant), Andrea Vedolin (discussant), and Luis Viceira for helpful comments. We thank seminar participants at the Stanford SITE conference, MIT Sloan, Chicago Booth, DePaul University, Boston College, Boston University, NYU Stern, Columbia SIPA, the Princeton Macro-Finance Conference, the NBER Asset Pricing Summer Institute, and the Texas Macroeconomics conference for helpful comments. The views expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of others in the Federal Reserve System. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. We thank Nick Bloom, John Campbell, Mike Golosov, Hanno Lustig, Alan Moreira, Kelly Shue (discussant), Andrea Vedolin (discussant), and Luis Viceira for helpful comments. We thank seminar participants at the Stanford SITE conference, MIT Sloan, Chicago Booth, DePaul University, Boston College, Boston University, NYU Stern, Columbia SIPA, the Princeton Macro-Finance Conference, the NBER Asset Pricing Summer Institute, and the Texas Macroeconomics conference for helpful comments. The views expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of others in the Federal Reserve System. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. Citation and Citation Data Copy Citation Matteo Leombroni, Carolin Pflueger, and Adi Sunderam, "Risk and Return in Government Bonds," NBER Working Paper 35973 (2026), https://doi.org/10.3386/w35973. Copy to Clipboard Download Citation MARC RIS BibTeΧ Download Citation Data In addition to working papers, the NBER disseminates affiliates’ latest findings through a range of free periodicals—the NBER Reporter, the NBER Digest, the Bulletin on Health, the Bulletin on the Economics of Alzheimer's, and the Bulletin on Entrepreneurship—as well as research spotlights, lectures, and panel videos. Presenters: Melissa Dell & Ashesh Rambachan Presenter: Paul Goldsmith-Pinkham

Read at the source →

More in this topic

ИсследованияSame Facts, Different Remedy: Linguistic Profiling and Arbitrariness in LLM and System One DecisionsarXiv:2611.08995v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models are increasingly used to resolve consumer complaints, and the way complainants write varies with age, education and socioeconomic status (SES). We audit three remedy-decision systems using sociolinguistic rewrites of US consumer financial complaints that are instructed to preserve every fact: two generative LLMs that return a single label (GPT-4o-mini and GPT-5-mini) and a probabilistic "System One" model that returns a distriarXiv cs.CY (Computers and Society)
ИсследованияAI Exposure and the Changing Responsibilities in Job PostingsarXiv:2611.09870v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The growing adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in the workplace has raised questions about how employer demand for different work activities is changing. We examine how the prevalence and content of work activities in online job postings change in association with activity-level measures of AI exposure, derived from Copilot and Claude usage. To enable systematic comparisons, we develop a pipeline that extracts the responsibilities from job adarXiv cs.CY (Computers and Society)
ИсследованияSeeing Is Not Knowing: The Epistemic Limits of LLM-Based Mental Health Inference from Youth Social Media ConversationsarXiv:2611.08565v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Adolescents increasingly use social media for private conversations, sharing experiences and seeking support. These interactions generate digital traces, prompting efforts to infer mental health and psychosocial states. As large language models become more capable of reasoning about conversations and interpersonal dynamics, a fundamental question remains nonetheless: what can models actually "know" about an individual's psychological experience farXiv cs.CY (Computers and Society)
ИсследованияEntering a New Domain in the Era of Generative AI: An Autoethnography of Solo Game Development as a Bioinformatics EducatorarXiv:2611.09623v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The rapid improvement of generative AI (GenAI) not only increased the efficiency of practice but also empowered individuals with capabilities to explore new domains. However, identity formation in the wake of such empowerment remains understudied. We use an autoethnography to understand identity formation in the context of solo game development as a bioinformatics educator. With the goal of developing a create-your-own-adventure (CYOA) game, we carXiv cs.CY (Computers and Society)